|
|
New, improved guidelines from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) about how to deal with a broken compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) are intended to take some of the mystery out of the purchase and use of CFLs. But by suggesting a response that borders on Hazmat lockdown, the guidelines may potentially add to consumers' uncertainties.
What are the risks?
The guidelines are intended to inform consumers of how to safely respond to a broken CFL. How much of a risk is really involved?
A working group opinion (PDF) accompanying the new release on the EPA website suggests that the miniscule amount of vaporized mercury from a single broken bulb is within the safe range for adults. Studies have measured the level of vapor shortly after a CFL breakage to be between 8 and 20 micrograms per cubic meter, and levels decline rapidly within a few minutes. To give some context, 100 micrograms per cubic meter is considered a safe level for long-term occupational exposure.
However, the scientists conclude that there is not enough data to make a similar evaluation regarding children--especially since children's behaviors are different from adults'--and a reliable risk assessment regarding children and broken CFLs is not currently available.
In the absence of evidence that short-term, low-level exposure is safe for all households, the EPA has provided guidelines that help consumers minimize that exposure until more is known.
Are guidelines like these helpful, or do they scare people so much they may not buy the bulbs? Alternately, are the guidelines so impractical that consumers may ignore them altogether?
I'm likely to send my kids out of the room in response to any broken glass, and I certainly won't invite them to play with quicksilver, the way I did in high school chemistry class. But it's January in Vermont, so opening a window and turning off the heat for several hours sounds extreme. Good thing we almost never need to replace our CFLs, so the likelihood of breakage is low.
Let us know what you think in the comments below.
Posted by Paula Melton on January 3, 2011
Recent CommentsLiving Future 2012 Was a Riotrdbgreen says, "That would be really great. Travel budgets are very small these days! Something a little closer would be awesome. " More...Michelle says, " During Jason's keynote, he suggested that - while they're not interested in growing the conference beyond 1000 attendees - they may add a... " More...J. R. Anderson says, " the smaller size of conference has been an enticement for me for sometime. Going back to the 1st GreenBuild conference where only 4,000... " More...Army: No, We Are Not Abandoning LEEDR.Ambrose says, "I for one was dismayed that the Army is not going to abandoned LEED. LEED is a collection of rules that defines construction practices and... " More...Getting Around Without Fossil FuelsYusuf Turab says, "I really thought a large percentage of Indians would be driving electirc/hybrid cars by now. Unfortunately the government subsidies and improved... " More...Archives by Category
AIA Convention (4)
Behind the Scenes (1) Books & Media (1) BuildingGreen Sounds Off (28) Colleges and Universities (1) Energy Solutions (98) floor finish (1) Greenbuild '10 (7) Greenbuild '11 (6) GreenSpec Insights (108) LEED (3) Miscellania (1) Mister Tristan Talks LEED (20) Nature & Nurture (1) On Our Radar (23) Op-Ed (3) Passive Survivability (1) polyurethane (1) Product Talk (9) Resilient Design (12) Riversong's Radical Reflections (11) The Industry (3) Water Wise Guys (10) water-based coating (1) |
I agree that for most people
Since white LEDs have swamped