LIVE image
Sort of. The executive summary of the September 2008 Electric Power Monthly, released a few days ago by the Energy Information Administration — a statistical agency of the U.S. Department of Energy — states that "Wind-powered generation [in June 2008] was 81.6 percent higher than it was in June 2007." Holy cow! However, it goes on, "Even with this significant increase, the contribution of wind-powered generation to the national total was only 1.2 percent in June 2008." Does it constitute a baby step in the right direction nonetheless? Maybe. The statistics are a snapshot of two chunks of time: the months of June in 2007 and 2008. Increasing the aperture gives a more complete picture. In the first six months of 2008, national power generation (which was up a point over 2007) sources break down like this:
  • coal-fired plants increased by 0.8 percent — contributing 48.9 percent of total U.S. electric power
  • nuclear was down 0.5 percent — comprising 19.5 percent of America's electricity
  • generation from petroleum liquids and coke, down 42.9 percent (no surprise there) — making up just 1.1 percent of the total power picture in the states
  • natural gas-fired generation was up 4.4 percent (a bit unexpected) — 19.8 percent of the national generation
  • conventional hydroelectric, up 3.3 percent — a 7.3 percent contribution
  • wind generation, year-to-date, rose 47.8 percent (windmills in Texas and Colorado generated 57.5 percent of that increase) — this and other renewables including biomass, geothermal, solar, and other miscellaneous energy sources comprised the remaining 7.3 percent

If you enjoyed this article, sign up for BuildingGreen email updates

*

Comments


— Share This Posting!

Recent Discussions

posted by lemon
on May 20, 2013

I too have been trying to find a non-toxic sofa and am frustrated by the lack of options.

I have a ratty-looking but structurally-sound...

posted by needcleanair
on May 17, 2013

I am a little (a lot) late to this conversation, but I think the only wood-burning appliances should be direct vent masonry ovens which burn at...

posted by ttabach
on May 16, 2013

Am hearing about this new technology and seeing positive reviews online but have also being told that they're not appropriate for larger, older...

Recent Comments


Why Can’t I Buy a Non-Toxic Sofa?

Andrea Lemon says, "

I too have been trying to find a non-toxic sofa and am frustrated by the lack of options.

I have a ratty-looking but structurally-sound sofa...

" More...


Have Your Wood or Pellet Stove and Cleaner Air Too

Barbara A. Smith says, "

I am a little (a lot) late to this conversation, but I think the only wood-burning appliances should be direct vent masonry ovens which burn at...

" More...


The Mismeasure of Buildings: Five Reasons Life-Cycle Assessment Will Not Give Us Zero-Impact Design

Alex Bruce says, "

...

" More...


7 Tips to Get More from Mini-Split Heat Pumps in Colder Climates

Paula Melton says, "

Tanya, the guest author has shared this reply with me via email.

 

Hi Tanya,

I agree totally with Tristan. The first...

" More...

Tristan Roberts says, "

Hi Tanya, I'm going to punt on this question, but hopefully in a way that is helpful. There are a lot of advantages to mini-split systems, but...

" More...