LIVE image
Creating a superinsulated building envelope is one of the key requirements with passive survivability. I saw this superinsulated home feature when I was in Sweden last year.
Photo: Alex Wilson. Click for bigger.
(More below.)
Those who have kept an eye on the suggestions we've made over the past few years regarding passive survivability might be interested in some recent developments. By way of background for those who haven't tracked this issue, here's the thumbnail sketch: In an age with more intense storms, terrorist actions against our energy infrastructure, potential petroleum shortages, and drought, we should be designing homes, apartment buildings, schools, and certain other public-use buildings so that they maintain livable conditions in the event of extended power outages or interruptions in heating fuel or water. I had initially been proposing passive survivability as a smart design criterion. More recently I've been advocating that we mandate passive survivability through building codes. There are a number of developments along these lines:
Creating a superinsulated building envelope is one of the key requirements with passive survivability. I saw these superinsulated home features when I was in Sweden last year.
Photos: Alex Wilson.
Click for bigger.
First, an article I wrote making this case is coming out shortly in Building Safety Journal, the magazine of the International Code Council. I have no idea what the response to this article might be among code officials, but I'll be watching carefully. Second, I'm participating in a committee that's providing input to the upcoming revision of New York City's building codes. We're trying to figure out what it will take to make the city's buildings and infrastructure more adaptable to climate change. I'm not sure where this will end up, but one of the ideas we're pursuing is to require dual-mode buildings. Dual-mode buildings would operate with conventional HVAC systems in normal conditions, but could be switched over to a passive operation mode during a power outage. Third, I was recently in California speaking at a couple conferences — including on passive survivability at San Diego Green. Following the San Diego conference, I led a brainstorming meeting to address passive survivability. The group of a dozen or so individuals, including Bob Berkebile, Chuck Angyal, and Drew George, focused on three questions: 1. What constitutes "livable conditions"? We pondered whether a house would need to maintain 50°F in the winter to keep people safe (wearing coats), or if a house would need to be 55°F. How hot could a house get in the summer and not put its occupants at undue risk? We concluded that there's a significant body of knowledge out there to tap into on these questions — such as emergency management databases and ASHRAE technical committees on comfort. 2. How easy is it to model the "drift conditions" of buildings? I was surprised here to learn that our more sophisticated energy modeling software tools can do this without any modification — one only needs to vary the inputs. That's good news indeed. 3. Do we need "performance standards" for passive survivability or could "prescriptive standards" suffice? This is a tougher question. It's hard to deal with passive solar heating, daylighting, or cooling load avoidance on a strictly prescriptive basis, but we felt that having both a prescriptive path and a performance path would be ideal. We have a lot of work to do in answering this question and moving ahead with those prescriptive standards. One of the new ideas that came out of the San Diego meeting was to come up with labeling of houses to indicate how they stack up relative to passive survivability — perhaps an A through F scale — and get insurance companies to buy in to preferential rates for the higher-ranked buildings. I continue to believe that the insurance industry could be a big driver of passive survivability.
Lake Mead, which supplies 90% of Las Vegas's water, is less than half full today. Maybe it's time we begin designing buildings to get by if water shortages or water rationing become a reality — not all that unlikely, especially with Scripps Institute scientists telling us there's a 50% chance that Lake Mead will be functionally empty by 2021.
Photo: Ken Dewey. Click for bigger.
Finally, having just returned from Las Vegas, where I was attending the WaterSmart Innovations conference (about water efficiency and water conservation), I'm inspired to push harder to address water to a greater extent in defining passive survivability. In most cases, the idea with passive survivability probably won't be to create homes and other buildings that can be totally self-sufficient with water. Rather, we will push for buildings that can get by all right if water were to be rationed or only available intermittently for periods of time in the future. If anyone wants to be part of this ongoing discussion about passive survivability, reply to this posting or e-mail me directly: alex@buildinggreen.com

If you enjoyed this article, sign up for BuildingGreen email updates

*

Comments

1 Great topic and one that I wo posted by Christopher Kowal on 11/04/2008 at 09:41 am

Great topic and one that I would like to see grow much as the so called “green” movement has over the past decade. Passive survivability really is part of what I would consider common sense, though deserving of additional attention – build so that maintenance (heating, cooling, water collection, waste removal, repair, etc.) require as little additional resources as possible. That is the kind of place that I want to live in, both in times of plenty and in times of scarcity; safe places of lasting utility and value. - christopher.kowal@gmail.com

2 I see passive survivability a posted by Jamie Wolf on 10/27/2008 at 06:23 am

I see passive survivability and the many earnest efforts toward the aspirational goals of net zero energy /carbon converging. Where this once seemed an interesting and useful new framework for designers (not unlike Universal Design) to be integrating, it is feeling central to the redefinition of what a good building is (as in: our current definitions are becoming obsolete).

I agree that the insurance industry will/should be very interested. When it comes to sustainability and deesignbuilding, while our practice and understanding are advancing, the economic constructs that surround those practices are in desperate need of change too.

Keep us appraised, and involved, in this important work.

3 My article on incorporating p posted by Alex Wilson on 12/13/2008 at 10:01 am

My article on incorporating passive survivability into building codes has been published in the November issue of Building Safety Journal, the magazine of the International Code Council. The article can be downloaded at the following website: http://www.iccsafe.org/news/bsj/. Feedback welcome! -Alex

4 "Passive Survivability" is a posted by Crystal Heshmat on 12/13/2008 at 07:16 am

"Passive Survivability" is a great term! I'd like to be included on further discusions on this topic. Also, please let us know when your article is published. Thank you.


— Share This Posting!

Recent Discussions

posted by behrlich
on Aug 13, 2014

Hi Evan, We share your nano concerns, and as a precaution, GreenSpec does not list nanotechnology products. I chatted with another one of their...

posted by levi
on Aug 13, 2014

My wife looked into this product and was told by a manufacturer's rep that Armor products rely on nano technology to achieve it's high strength....

posted by bdez
on Aug 12, 2014

Hello - This alert is very helpful. I am repainting the interior of my house, and am finding it hard to locate sources of your editors picks so...

Recent Comments


7 Tips to Get More from Mini-Split Heat Pumps in Colder Climates

Robert Henshaw says, "Thanks for the comments" More...

Ruth Schneider says, "Interesting...definitely want mini split/ductless. So are F and M equal in quality? Mits has the most contractors/dealers near to us. " More...

bob coleman says, "The Mits is a min-split The Lennox is likely a typical HVAC heat pump system, with indoor ducts, and a cabinet indoors with a larger heat pump..." More...

bob coleman says, "These units are not big monster noise makers like the typical outdoor compressor. Of course vibration could be an issue due to some sort of home..." More...

Robert Henshaw says, "I am concerned about noise and vibration transmitted from the exterior unit to the inside of the house. I am considering a Mitsubishi system, or..." More...