LIVE image
What are the environmental priorities in your region? How can you find out?

As you may know, USGBC responded to the longstanding call for regionalization of LEED by establishing Regional Priority Credit 1 (RPc1) in its LEED 2009 family of rating systems (NC, CS, CI, Schools, EBOM).

Regional priority credits are identified by USGBC Regional Councils for each zipcode within their region, with input from USGBC Chapters. These bonus points are granted for meeting requirements that have been designated as particularly important for your project's specific geographical area.

Not new credits

The RP points are for normal LEED credits, not new ones written for your region. To me, this is both good and bad. I would have liked to see more regional innovation around LEED, with credits written for specific regions going after issues near and dear to those regions. That could get pretty unwieldy, though, so the solution of offering bonus points for existing credits makes a certain amount of sense. You don't have to do anything to earn the RP points.  You enter your project's zipcode when you register in LEED Online, and the system automatically credits you with a bonus point when you earn a credit that is designated as a regional priority credit for your zip code, up to four bonus

Know what you're aiming for

The key thing is to know what you're aiming for. The bonus points mean that if you're on the fence about going after a certain credit, or deciding what threshold to aim for, an extra point might help you make your decision.

To find out, you have two options. One, use the rather clunky spreadsheets offered by USGBC. A key thing here is to make sure you've selected the right tab from the bottom of the window for your rating system.

To make things easier, we at LEEDuser (in collaboration with Environmental Building Strategies) have just launched a quick LEED Regional Priority reference tool. Enter your zipcode and rating system, and voila! As a bonus, the six credits you get for results are linked directly to LEEDuser's how-to guidance for each credit. So if you're not clear on the exact requirements or thresholds, or you need some sample documentation, it's right there.

Your experiences?

After launching this tool today, I heard right away from a person doing a project in New Jersey whose zipcode wasn't listed. I double-checked our tool, and then USGBC's spreadsheets (again, where we get our data) and it was indeed missing. I have heard of some instances of this as USGBC has launched this whole thing, but I was a little surprised at this, to be honest. Nonetheless, keep an eye out for oddities like this, and if you see something that doesn't seem quite right, don't be too surprised.

 What are your experiences with RPc1? Your opinions on LEED regionalization in general?

If you enjoyed this article, sign up for BuildingGreen email updates:



1 If the renewable energy being posted by Tristan Roberts on 05/04/2010 at 01:36 pm

If the renewable energy being produced is part of a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) that's required by law, it's not eligible for Green-e certification and thus for LEED EAc6. Similarly, if RECs are being sold from the energy, it's not eligible. The idea in both cases is the the renewable energy in question is more business as usual than an extraordinary green measure that should be rewarded. I don't know if renewable energy from feed-in tariffs would come under either of these scenarios. Any thoughts?

2 Talking about LEED, we wre ge posted by Mark Kelley on 05/04/2010 at 06:49 am

Talking about LEED, we wre getting well out on the curve of introducing feed-in tariffs on PV and other renewable generation, but in the past, renewable certificates and other incentives led to the exclusion of renewable energy from LEED renewable credits. What is the current status of renewable energy procduced in a LEED building that receives the feed-in tariff?

Add comment

Login or register to post comments

— Share This Posting!

About the Authors


Recent Discussions

posted by behrlich
on Nov 23, 2015

PLAs do not have to be made from corn, of course, but in this case it is, which means it probably does have some GMO, unfortunately. The product...

posted by priya
on Nov 20, 2015

Hard to rate this product without knowing if it's GMO.

Recent Comments

Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC): Will the U.S. Ever Lighten Up?

Simon Hatton says, "Merhis Projects are an Australian Developer and Construction company and have been using their patented Merhis Building System for the last 4 years...." More...

Getting to Know Spider Insulation

Robert Haverlock says, "Cynthia, All wood has formaldehyde. And as far as I know, Canada does not allow added formaldehyde in their building products, Roxul included. Ask..." More...

Alex Wilson says, "Cynthia, yes that's correct; there is formaldehyde in mineral wool (urea-extended phenol formaldehyde). I'm not as worried about that as many others..." More...

Cynthia Crawford says, "

Alex-Sorry- I meant to say sprayed- fiberglass. Thank you for your answer in any case, for both foam and fiberglass. It's the first time I've...

" More...

Alex Wilson says, "Cynthia, Spider is a spray-fiberglass product, not a spray-foam, but neither material could be considered rodent-proof. In our home, rodent entry at..." More...