LIVE image
Ah, if only it were possible to be a fly-on-the-wall in every committee for every standard... I know this is a fantasy only a standards-geek could have, and is one of those fantasies you don't really want to actualize, but there's no doubt much of the real work defining the rules of the game is done in committee meetings that most of us never hear about. In their last meeting, with little fanfare, the NSF-140 committee approved a simple change that greenwash-fighters should approve of, while finding the need for it unfortunate. The language in the standard was changed to say, "A certified and non-certified product cannot have the same trade name designation." What this means is that a company can't get, for example, NSF-140 Platinum on select options for a product line, and then go and market the main product line as NSF-140 Platinum. Apparently, this issue was brought to the table because one company was doing just that — marketing the product line as NSF-140 Platinum despite the fact that the platinum prerequisite of 10% post-consumer recycled material was only met with special order options. The discrepancy is being fixed by the company — as is the standard by NSF. The NSF-140 committee also removed a durability test that required 350 parts per million of fluorocarbons for stain resistance (after debating the counter-intuitive rationale for including a test in a sustainability standard that requires addition of an environmentally problematic substance). They also required less persistent C6 instead of C8 fluorocarbons; a change that suppliers are apparently making proactively given growing concern over the potential environmental and health impacts of fluorocarbons. None of this is final — there is more discussion to come and then at some point the decisions will be folded into the next version. But in general, I'd call all of this a good story of self-correction by the industry. When competitors police each other's greenwash and have animated discussions on proving durability without compromising other aspects of sustainability, we're starting to get somewhere — recognizing of course, that we still have a long way to go. From EBN: Making Carpet Environmentally Friendly and more

If you enjoyed this article, sign up for BuildingGreen email updates

*

Comments

1 Amen posted by JAB on 07/31/2009 at 09:14 am

Amen


— Share This Posting!

Recent Discussions

posted by bates.paul
on Apr 9, 2015

Hi-

I reviewed your story on "...

posted by granda
on Apr 8, 2015

Hi Alex,
I've been following your experience with the Zehnder unit with interest. By the way, my understanding is that Barry Stephens is...

posted by joetmail
on Apr 4, 2015

Thanks Alex. Replacing the siding is really not an option. Without the opportunity to create a drainage plane I shy away from spray foam in...

Recent Comments


Using Your Heating System to Heat Water

norm palmer says, "Same 2 units but different approach: am trying to noodle thru whether to plumb the units so as to preheat the indirect oil fired water heater..." More...

Alex Wilson says, "Norm, This is an interesting idea. I'm not an expert on DHW, but in my last house I did have a Buderus boiler with an indirect water heater. I think..." More...

norm palmer says, "I would like to know if any one has experienced using a geospring hybrid water heater (or even a standard water htr) in parallel with an existing..." More...


Getting to Know Spider Insulation

Paul Bates says, "Hi- I reviewed your story on "Formaldehyde-Based Foam Insulation Back from the Dead". I appreciate the balanced and thorough review. I was..." More...


Commissioning Our Home's Heat-Recovery Ventilator

Christopher Granda says, "Hi Alex, I've been following your experience with the Zehnder unit with interest. By the way, my understanding is that Barry Stephens is brother to..." More...